ModelPickr

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B versus Qwen3.8 27B on price, context, and capabilities. Both are in the Qwen group. Costs use a shared reference workload. Prices from Models.dev. Data last refreshed Oct 14, 2026, 05:43 PM UTC.

Compare / Qwen

Qwen · canonical pair

Qwen3.6 35B-A3BvsQwen3.8 27B

Alphabetical by model id, so this URL is the one to index. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is alibaba/qwen3.6-35b-a3b. Qwen3.8 27B is alibaba/qwen3.8-27b. Both are among the models the most providers list, inside the Qwen group.

vs

100 requests a day, 2,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens, no cache hits. A light chat workload so the rate cards are comparable.
SpecQwen3.6 35B-A3BQwen3.8 27B
Monthly, reference workload$3.72$7.02
Input / 1M$0.25$0.42
Output / 1M$1.49$3.00
Cache read / 1M—$0.085
Cache write / 1M——
Context262,144262,144
Max output65,53632,768
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callsYesYes
VisionYesYes
Open weightsYesYes
Providers3645
Released2026-04-172026-08-14

Same workload, your numbers

Prices are USD per 1M tokens. A month is 30 days. Cache hits use the cache-read rate when the model has one; otherwise the cache field is ignored.

Estimated monthly cost

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

$3.72

Cache hit is ignored because this model has no cache-read price.

Qwen3.8 27B costs $3.30 more per month than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B at these inputs.

monthly = requests/day × 30 × (input tokens × (1 − cache hit) × input price + input tokens × cache hit × cache-read price + output tokens × output price) ÷ 1,000,000